Enterprise & ERP Solutions for
Mid-Market Enterprises

ERP programmes rarely fail on the software; they fail on migrated data nobody trusts and processes the tool won't bend to. We treat data migration, reconciliation and cutover as first-class engineering work, integrate the finance, inventory and HR systems you already depend on, and phase the rollout so the business keeps running while the platform changes underneath it.

The problem

ERP programmes fail on the data, not the software

The platform gets configured, the training happens, and then finance quietly keeps using the old spreadsheet because the migrated numbers don't reconcile. Once people stop trusting what's on screen, the rollout is over regardless of how well the software works.

Migration asengineering work

Phased, notbig-bang

Processes the toolactually fits

Numbers that reconcile.Cutovers that hold.

Trust

is lost at reconciliation

If the opening balances don't tie back to the old system, the finance team keeps a parallel copy — and you now run two systems instead of one.

Big-bang

cutovers concentrate the risk

Moving every function on one weekend means every problem arrives at once, with no working fallback and no one left to diagnose it.

Our fix

reconcile before you cut over

Migration, reconciliation and rollback are treated as first-class deliverables, rehearsed against real data before the date that matters.

Enterprise & ERP Solutions

ERP Implementation & Customization

We map your processes against what the platform does natively, then configure to that line and customise only where the process is how you actually compete. Every modification is something you re-test at each upgrade, so we argue for fewer of them.

Business Process Automation

Approval routing, document handling and the recurring finance and procurement tasks people currently chase by email, moved into the platform's own workflow engine. Approval thresholds and exception paths get agreed with the people who own the process.

Integration Services

We connect the finance, inventory, HR and third-party systems you're keeping, so a figure is entered once rather than re-keyed in three places and quietly diverging. Interfaces are monitored, with failed records surfaced instead of silently dropped.

Analytics & Reporting

The operational and statutory reports the business actually runs on, built against one ledger so two dashboards stop disagreeing. We rebuild the spreadsheets people rely on, because those are what they'll fall back to otherwise.

Cloud & On-Premise Solutions

Hosted, on-premise or hybrid, chosen against your data residency, latency and existing licensing rather than a default preference. Environments are provisioned as code so development, test and production stay genuinely comparable.

ERP Upgrades & Support

Configuration changes, new reports and version upgrades tested in a lower environment before they reach production, with named contacts and agreed response times. Customisations are re-verified at each upgrade rather than discovered broken after it.

What changes

Outcomes we hold ourselves to

Every engagement starts by agreeing which of these numbers we're moving, and how we'll measure it. Ranges below reflect what our ERP engagements have delivered — your starting point determines where you land.

Days to hours

on month-end close

Once finance is working from one ledger instead of reconciling exports from several systems by hand.

100%

reconciled before cutover

Opening balances and control totals tie back to the outgoing system, signed off by your finance team rather than by us.

No re-keying

between core systems

Finance, inventory and HR share data through integrations, so the same figure stops being entered three times and diverging.

Phased

rollout with a rollback

Each phase has a tested route back, so a problem in week one is reversible rather than an emergency.

How we work

Three ways to start

ERP programmes go wrong when the shape of the engagement never matched how much was actually known up front. Pick the one that fits what you know today; moving between them mid-programme is normal.

Implementation & migration

For a chosen platform with agreed scope and a defined cutover plan.

Migration and reconciliation rehearsed against real data
Integrations with the finance, inventory and HR systems you keep
Phased go-live, each phase with a tested rollback

Timeline

16–32 weeks, phased

Best for

A committed platform decision

Trust & compliance

Built to survive an audit

An ERP holds your financial record. The controls around who can change what, and the evidence that it happened, are part of the implementation rather than a later project.

Aligned to

GDPR

SOC 2

ISO 27001

IFRS

SOX-ready

Segregation of duties

Role design that separates who raises, approves and pays, configured deliberately rather than inherited from a default permission set.

Migration evidence retained

Reconciliation working papers, control totals and sign-offs kept as an audit trail for the numbers you carried across.

Change control on configuration

Configuration changes move through environments with approval recorded, so production changes aren't made directly by whoever has access.

Data residency and retention

Hosting region, retention periods and personal-data handling agreed against GDPR obligations before go-live rather than after.

Common questions

The things people usually ask us

Still have a question?Tell us what you’re weighing up and we’ll come back with a straight answer — usually inside a business day.

Talk to the team

For a mid-market business, typically four to eight months to first go-live, phased rather than all at once. Anyone quoting six weeks is either scoping something very small or planning to skip the data work — which is exactly where these programmes fail. The fit review gives you a schedule based on your actual data and process complexity.

Change the process where the standard approach is genuinely fine, and customise where the process is how you actually compete. The failure mode is customising everything, because every modification is something you then maintain and re-test at every upgrade. We'll push back when a customisation isn't worth its long-term cost.

Usually you migrate open transactions and balances, plus a defined period of history, and keep the old system available read-only for anything older. Migrating a decade of detail into a new platform is expensive and rarely used. We agree the cut-off with your finance and audit stakeholders rather than deciding it technically.

Yes — that's the point of phasing it. We move functions in planned waves, keep the outgoing system available while we verify the new one, and rehearse the cutover before the real one. Any window that genuinely needs the business paused gets agreed well in advance.

It's the normal starting point, and finding out early is the whole reason the fit review looks at data quality first. Cleansing usually happens alongside the build rather than as a prerequisite — but you should know the scale of it before committing to a date, not after.

Building intelligent digital products across AI, security, and cloud.

Our Services

Our Products

Useful Links

+966 50 236 8268

info@bmi.com